Disclaimer: Unless noted otherwise, views and analysis expressed here are the author's own and based on public sources. The article is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. This is not financial advice. Please consult a professional for investment decisions. Note: this article was originally published in November 2025. For the July 2026 update, see here.

*********************

Very unusual to see an American company whose comp set is made up almost entirely of mid-cap European stocks. And the stocks in question are battle-hardened HoldCos like Chapters Group, LIFCO, Röko, Lagercrantz and others (and yes, we have covered most of them in the blog).

Even more unusual to see a programmatic acquirer that is not particularly acquisitive, or produces much cash flow. 

Teamshares is all of those things – and it’s going public via a SPAC. The SPAC, called Live Oak Acquisition, is affiliated with the investment firm T. Rowe Price (the same investor led Bending Spoons’ most recent round). 

In September 2024, we published a deep-dive on Teamshares that instantly became one of our most popular articles: Admired, copied, misunderstood: the incredible story of Teamshares. The equity story at the time revolved around buying Main Street businesses, cheaply, and converting them into captive customers of financial products. Put differently, the end game was not necessarily the companies themselves, but the platform that was being built out. 

In the year since, the narrative has decisively shifted. The revamped Teamshares pitches itself as a Swedish-style compounder (link to the SPAC deck) looking to ride the US SMB succession wave:

Source: Teamshares SPAC presentation 

This volte-face is not necessarily a bad thing. 

For a while, Teamshares was on a trajectory that looked part Storskogen and part Thrasio (“7 companies closed in a single month” - according to the SPAC deck). A fast-paced but seemingly random M&A strategy (a butcher chain, a design firm, a fast-food restaurant!) overseen by an oversized central team. Despite the makeover, the SPAC presentation shows that Teamshares is still lossmaking (6 years in), weighed down by $40M in annual corporate costs and $30M in interest payments - against only $60M in asset level EBITDA (which is admittedly double last year’s levels). 

Teamshares is pricing the SPAC at a 36% discount to the 2024 Series E (source), valuing the company at $525M equity value / $746M enterprise value, with $333M in targeted equity proceeds.  

As we await further SPAC docs - basic things like a balance sheet are missing - here are our initial thoughts around:

  1. Revenue growth

  2. Capital deployment

  3. What does a central team do in a HoldCo?

  4. Debt facility

  5. Closing thoughts: implications for serial acquirers

Before we get into the weeds, please remember that all of this is for your education entertainment purposes and based on public information. This is not investment advice. 

1. Revenue growth: below prior forecasts

In August 2023, Teamshares had 84 businesses in the portfolio generating $400M in run-rate revenue. The latest stats are 87 and $434M, respectively (LTM to June 30, 2025).  

A 2022 investor deck we reviewed projected 2025 revenues of $2.4B with nearly 700 companies in the portfolio. In other words, Teamshares was meant to be adding 200 companies a year.   

What happened? Teamshares has clearly divested a number of businesses. A few have failed and shut down. But the larger issue appears to be a lack of capital to pursue M&A since late 2023:

Source: Teamshares filings, RollUpEurope analysis

2. Capital deployment: where did all the money go?

How much capital has Teamshares deployed to date? Hard to say without a balance sheet, but our estimate is north of $500M. We get there by adding: 

Note: our calculations exclude minority interests tied to employee ownership of the portfolio companies, as this information has not been disclosed. 

On that basis, dividing the $500M by the 2025 pro forma asset-level EBITDA of $60 million, yields an implied buy-in multiple of >8x.

This doesn’t sound right, does it? 

logo

Subscribe to Premium to read the rest.

Become a paying subscriber of Premium to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.

Upgrade

A subscription gets you:

  • Access to premium content
  • Cancel anytime
  • Help keep the lights on 😜

Keep Reading